The Wolf Watching the Chicken Coop Or The Legion of Doomby: JeffcosSupermanThu Apr 16, 2009 at 13:02:49 PM MDT |
| West word featured the article "Sharles Johnson (pronounced Shar-less) is a hero to his children -- and the arch-enemy of Jefferson County."
www.marchforthefamily.com shows what has been going on The Citizens Review panel (CRP) is group of people from the community who can deal with the ethics and behaviors of case workers when it comes to Dependency and Neglect cases. This statute is found in the Colorado Revised Statutes 19-3-211. Conflict resolution process
Jefferson County was keeping this process internal, so people would think that this was the only way to resolve the unethical unprofessionalretaliatory things that can/do go on was to speak with Jefferson County Human Services. This would be a good way to keep their will and beliefs, this would be a perfect way to people to do their treatment plans fitting or not. |
| This was taken to the State of Colorado and we all know how oversight from the State of Colorado Human Services can sometimes go.
A call was made to the State auditor's Office in May 2007. They were given a brief but detailed account.
Read pages 69-72. "We found that counties frequently do not comply with requirements for the grievance process, resulting in complainants' being denied their rights to seek resolution from a body outside the county departments" Sound familiar? Jefferson County Human Services told the Office of Civil Rights. "They had posted the Notice of Client Rights on the second floor and Rights and Remedies were given". What they didn't know is that pictures were taken in 2004 showing nothing posted, behind these locked glass cases!! The notification of Rights and information about the CRP magically appeared when knowledge of a Civil Rights complaint became known. This is called lying. Why does Jefferson County cover up what they had not been doing? Why do employees cover for each other, to the point of committing FORGERY!! I found out about the CRP 8 months into the case. The director of human services sends me a letter stating "You requested the Citizen review Panel" attached was an initial complaint form. I had complained since the beginning of the case which was in April. I was to be told about this process, not discover it. Jeffco services sends me a confidentiality form. The law actually addresses confidentiality "no participant in the conflict resolution process shall divulge or make public any confidential information contained in a report of child abuse or neglect or in other case file records to which he or she has been provided access". NO other county does this besides Jeff co. A letters forwarded to me:
"Mr.Gunnett,
Mr. Gunnett: "Commissioner Hartman,
1. Mr. Johnson said not that he was reluctant to sign but that he refused to sign a "release" that vitiated his first amendment rights, prohibiting him from ever telling anyone of any of the proceedings at any time. It appeared that it would have gagged him permanently and he saw that as inappropriate.
Kathy Hartman was following the statute(by word) but yet will not correct the county on what they had done. Who is really about the people? The new director is still allowing this. They did not want people to hear what would come out of a meeting with me. "Counties we visited lack mechanisms to specifically inform complainants that they have the right to take a grievance to a citizen review panel or board of county commissioners if they are not satisfied with the county department's resolution. Further, in five of these counties the department staff, not the complainant, determine whether a complaint will be allowed to go to a panel or county board. Statutes specifically give complainants, as well as the county departments, the right to take unresolved complaints outside the county departments." On Jeffco's web site (http://www.co.jefferson.co.us/bcc/bcc_T25_R10.htm) look up Citizen Review panel. "The board conducts hearings to ascertain the legitimacy of complaints against Human Services programs and submits recommendations to the Director of Human Services regarding their resolutions". This information is misleading. So even if you find it, you don't know that you really did. State law says "The purpose of such conflict resolution process is to provide a forum for grievances concerning the conduct of county department personnel in performing their duties pursuant to this article". The Auditor asked that some of the following be implemented:
"Eliminate the requirement that county departments of human/social services attempt to resolve grievances informally before using the statutory grievance process, or clarify the meaning of this rule in a way that is consistent with the Rights provided in statute." The State of Colorado agreed as this was to be done by July 2008. As of recent people, I have spoken with says they know nothing about the CRP. Often they know if they disagree with Jefferson County Human Service case workers take it personal and then retaliation starts. We are confronting retaliation now.Though we won the case. The case workers that have done and continue to do these detrimental things are still employed. If you purposefully withhold the knowledge of a right, What are you afraid of? The people knowing what is being done in their name. When any agency believes a certain way of doing things are wrong, NORMALLY discipline is in the process. Since nothing has been done and things "sloppily" covered up, is not one saying this is "how we do business?!" This is the one of many things done in the name of the people of Jefferson County. This is not the people. We know many outside of those building's who have better integrity and ethics that this.
Horrible situations got manipulated by Jefferson County Human Services. We were never informed about the Citizen Review Panel. The same family who the county wanted so much to be involved with exposed what had been going on for years. Was it all really worth it?
|